The recent political chatter about “Obamacare” before the Supreme Court of the United States got a great deal of media attention. President Obama added fuel to the fire when he declared, “Ultimately, I am confident the Supreme Court will not take what would be an unprecedented, extraordinary step of overturning a law that was passed by a strong majority of a democratically elected Congress.”
For someone who was a law professor those words were absurd. Even if a bill passed unanimously in the house and senate, it could still be overturned – if the law was in violation of the Constitution.
Giving up is not “reform.” County Executive Ed Mangano’s proposal to transfer property assessment from the county to the towns might possibly speed up assessment decisions by replacing one large and overwhelmed bureaucracy with several somewhat smaller ones. It will likely recreate problems that were major motivations in creating our highly centralized county government 75 years ago.
The 1938 county charter merged the town Boards of Assessors and the County Board of Equalization, ending three decades of complaints, lawsuits and hard feelings about the lack of specific, uniform levels of property assessments between the towns. In a tax system screaming out for simplification, clarification and a sense of certainty, spinning off assessments to the towns will reintroduce “equalization” as an annual issue. Tens of thousands of residents are still trying to figure out why their assessment went down but their tax bill still went up. The division of taxes heading up the tax food chain in an equitable manner is the most complex subject in local government, and it’s all going to make people very sad, particularly in villages and school districts that are split between townships.
Manhattan District Attorney (D.A.) Robert Morgenthau was facing a spirited Democratic primary challenge from a former judge in 2005, but his opponent had trouble finding anything substantively negative to say about Morgenthau.
The reason I know this: a city-based tabloid newspaper reporter called me weeks before the election, asking whether it was legal to have a Manhattan driver’s license while at the same time registering and insuring a car in Dutchess County, where auto insurance premiums are much lower. The answer: yes, so long as the insured vehicle is primarily garaged in Dutchess County. I was the director of public affairs for the New York State Insurance Department at the time and knew immediately the question pertained to Morgenthau because he met those criteria.
Written by Mike Barry, Mfbarry@Optonline.Net Friday, 25 January 2013 00:00Charles Lindbergh won worldwide acclaim in 1927 when he became the first person to fly an airplane non-stop across the Atlantic Ocean, departing from Roosevelt Field and landing the following day in Paris.
Less than five years later, Lindbergh and his wife, Anne, tragically endured the dark side of being a global celebrity. Charles Lindbergh, Jr., their 20-month-old son, was kidnapped and later found dead, after being taken from his crib in the family’s Hopewell, New Jersey home.
PBS’s Nova program is broadcasting on Wednesday, Jan. 30 at 9 p.m. Who Killed Lindbergh’s Baby?, a very engaging one-hour documentary. The filmmakers re-examine, with subject matter experts, what were arguably The Crime, and the Trial, of the 20th Century, at least until the mid-1990s, when O.J. Simpson was acquitted of murdering his ex-wife, Nicole, and Ronald Goldman.
Bruno Hauptmann, despite protesting his innocence until the end of his life, was in the mid-1930s convicted for his role in the kidnapping and death of the Lindbergh baby. Hauptmann, a German immigrant, was executed and Nova’s experts believe he was involved in the crime, pointing to how one-third of the monies the Lindbergh family paid in ransom for their baby’s safe return were found in Hauptmann’s possession. It begs the question: who had the rest of the money, and is it possible that Hauptmann had accomplices who were never brought to justice?
The Nova investigation brings viewers into the Bronx, where a man of German ancestry named John Knoll, a rumored Hauptmann co-conspirator, resided in the early 1930s. But the most provocative and shocking theory about who was behind the kidnapping comes from Rutgers University’s Lloyd Gardner. The retired history professor believes the perpetrators had a reliable source within the Lindbergh household who was able to tell them when the baby would be most vulnerable.
While the documentary makes no mention of the Lindbergh family’s Long Island ties, it is worth noting that Charles and Anne Lindbergh, after the death of their first-born, eventually had five more children, and lived in the early 1940s in Lloyd Neck, according to Lindbergh, A. Scott Berg’s outstanding 1998 biography. Berg also learned while doing his research that Lindbergh wrote parts of We, his bestselling 1927 memoir, while staying at Falaise in Sands Point. It was then the home of Harry Guggenheim, a major financial backer of the earliest U.S. aviation projects.
I think what Berg’s biography of Lindbergh does best is chronicle how Charles and the former Anne Morrow, an accomplished writer who went on to write a few bestsellers herself, were not only well-positioned at an early age to succeed in life but took full advantage of their good fortune. Lindbergh’s father, an attorney, was a Minnesota Congressman while Morrow’s father, Dwight Morrow, was the U.S. Ambassador to Mexico before winning election to the U.S. Senate from New Jersey.
Yet the Nova program affirms how little of the Lindbergh and Morrow families’ history remains in the public’s collective memory, with most Americans remembering little about them beyond The Spirit of St. Louis and how its pilot’s 20-month-old son met a cruel fate.