Thursday, 16 January 2014 00:00
John Owens is correct when he says that inBloom’s promise that the student data it collects will be kept safe in its supposedly hack-proof cloud is “a lot less believable since info on 40 million Target customers was compromised”. I’d say that the most appropriate response to inBloom’s hollow assurances and unkeepable promise is contained in the first two letters of their claim “HAck-proof” : Ha ! My second response to inBloom’s wishful-thinking promise of its collected-data’s supposed invulnerability can be found inside the phrase Owens used to pointedly point out that inBloom’s “underLYING operating system was built by a company owned by Rupert Murdoch”. So when inBloom says that their student data will be “hack-proof”, they are lying — since they know that is literally impossible in a world of Julian Assanges, Edward Snowdens, Russian hackers, and thousands of brilliant conscience-less computer criminals and identity thieves. I’m guessing that any inBloom official who made such an unsupportable false claim had his fingers crossed behind his back when he spoke those words.